How Science Made Humanity Less Special
Discover more from Risk+Progress
How Science Made Humanity Less Special
But also more important
Science is a process of generating theories and experimentally testing them. When a theory does not pass muster, it is modified or cast aside. In the last five centuries, scientific discovery has dramatically altered our perceived place in the universe. I argue, that these same discoveries have also made human consciousness more profound and more important.
A Human-Centered Universe
Our naked eyes can only collect enough photons of light to view but a tiny sliver of the universe. From our perspective here on Earth, the heavens rotate around us. We appear to lie at the center, the only conscious beings in a vast universe. A recipe for certain hubris.
Historically, our conception of the heavens was rooted more in myth and philosophy than in science. Aristotle thought that the heavens were perfectly ordered, with the Earth at the center. The Sun and Moon were perfect spheres, orbiting Earth in perfect circles at a constant, unchanging speed. The stars were the white light of heaven peaking through, beyond which no material substance could exist.
But in this perfect universe, a problem vexed astronomers for millennia: the planets. Literally meaning “wanderer,” the position of the planets, unlike the stars, could not be predicted, often appearing to move forward, backward, closer, and further in the night sky.
Centuries later, Ptolemy suggested that the planets had two orbits, the deferent rotating around the Earth, and the epicycle, where it rotated within the deferent. From our perspective, this would cause the planet to move closer and farther from Earth, and even appear to slow down, stop, or move backward, at various times.
But his explanation could not accurately explain the planets’ movements either. For an ordered universe, this was a contradiction. Regardless, in the ancient universe, humanity stood at the center of it all. A narcissistic ode to understandable ignorance.
Turning the Universe Upside Down
It was Nicolaus Copernicus in the 1500s who was among the first to challenge Aristotle and Ptolemy. He suggested that if one placed the Sun, not the Earth, at the center of the solar system, the odd movement of the planets in the sky could be explained without the need for Ptolemy’s complex multiple orbits. A parsimonious proposition, but one that still could not accurately explain planetary positioning.
In the 1600s, Johannes Kepler accepted Copernicus's heliocentric universe and further challenged Aristotle, countering that the planets didn’t orbit the Sun in perfect circles, but rather in slight ellipses. By doing this, Kepler was able to accurately explain planetary movements, but he lacked any experimental means of proving his hypothesis.
Around the same time, Galileo Galilei, pointed a telescope at the night sky and finally put Aristotle’s universe to rest. Galileo saw mountains on the Moon and spots on the Sun…objective evidence that the heavens did not conform to Aristotelian perfection. More importantly, he witnessed phases of Venus, as predicted by Copernicus, and saw moons orbiting Jupiter. Suddenly, Earth was not necessarily the center of anything.
Galileo's evidence, although irrefutable, drew the wrath of the church as it went against over a thousand years of Christian teachings, and he spent his final years under house arrest. It’s easy to see why; a Heliocentric solar system meant that Earth was just another planet. Why would God govern anything other than the center of the universe? Regardless, the truth could not be buried.
A century later in the 1700s, standing upon the shoulders of Galileo and Kepler, Sir Issac Newton codified the laws of gravity and motion into mathematics. The same force that brought apples to the ground when they fell from a tree, he realized, also holds the planets around the Sun. We were no longer the center of the universe, but for the first time, humanity, like God himself, could understand the laws of the universe. Or so we thought.
Less Wrong, But Still Wrong
It turned out, we hadn’t figured it out. By Newton’s time, it was known that the planets orbit in ellipses and also that the orbits themselves also rotate around the Sun, in what is called precession. Newtonian physics accounted for precession, yet still, the planet Mercury’s orbit would not conform to the predicted path.
The explanation, it was thought, was that there was another planet near Mercury whose gravity disrupted its orbit. This theory was so prevalent that the planet even had a name: Vulcan. Yet, observations with increasingly powerful telescopes in the 19th century could not locate Vulcan. It turned out, Vulcan didn’t exist, it was merely another myth created to explain what we didn’t understand.
Mercury’s orbit was not distorted by another planet, but rather by space itself. Albert Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity, published in 1915, suggested that mass warps space. For planets that are distant from the Sun, such distortions were small and imperceptible. But for Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun, the impact was substantial enough to noticeably alter its orbit.
Einstein’s theory was not proven until 1919 when astronomers traveled to Brazil for a rare solar eclipse. The goal was to photograph a star cluster near the Sun at the moment the Moon blocked its light and to compare the stars’ position relative to photos taken on a normal night, absent the Sun's influence. Indeed, the apparent position of the stars was slightly distorted during the eclipse, proving Einstein correct, that mass literally bends space, altering the course of light as it reached the Earth.
An Expanding Universe
Through all of this human triumph, error, and discovery we still felt that we something of a rarity. Sure, the Sun was one of billions of stars, a fact finally proven in the 19th century. But we still believed it to be the only star to harbor planets, residing in the only galaxy in the cosmos, the Milky Way.
Just a few years later, Edwin Hubble trained a telescope at Andromeda, what was thought to be a dusty galactic nebula. Using a new measurement method to measure the distance to Cepheid variable stars, he came to an astounding discovery: Andromeda was far more distant than the most distant stars in our galaxy, it was a galaxy of its own. Today, we know the Milky Way to be just one of countless billions of galaxies in an ever-expanding universe. Once again, our special place in the universe was diminished.
In recent decades, planets, once thought to be rare, are now discovered almost weekly. This is done by carefully observing the “wobble” of distant stars, as their planets’ gravity tugs them off center during their orbits and/or the dimming effect when a planet passes in front of them. Planets appear to be just as abundant as the many stars of the universe.
We know very little about these planets, other than they provide trillions of opportunities for life to form. Making it all but extremely unlikely that Earth is alone in the universe in harboring life. Whether or not this life is intelligent and civilized, is the golden question, and the implications of such a discovery will be explored in a future article.
Less Special but More Important
Science’s discoveries have transformed who we thought we were. In 500 years, we went from the center of the universe, to living on just another planet among trillions. Each discovery on the macro scale, in some sense, has made humanity less special, but at the same time discoveries at the atomic scale have made humanity more important and profound.
In the 19th and 20th centuries, we came to understand that all matter is an arrangement of atoms. When combining atoms together, it forms molecules that take on different characteristics than the atoms that comprise them. One of these molecules is DNA. First described as a double helix structure in the 1950s by James Watson and Francis Crick, DNA contains the instructions that design life.
Through the trial and error of natural selection, as identified by Charles Darwin, DNA molecules passed instructions from one generation to the next, creating ever more complex forms of life. From single-celled organisms, to multicellular organisms, and eventually to human beings with complex brains capable of sentience.
These atoms did not arise magically, they have formed in the furnaces of steller activity…the stars themselves. Humans are merely a rearrangement of atoms that were born from dying stars. We are physically the product of the heavens, and to our knowledge, we are the only matter that is capable of self-awareness and discovering the universe that created us. We are the universe discovering itself.
For the Universe
For this reason, the light of consciousness and human civilization is profoundly important, if not for us, but for the universe. Will we continue to uncover its secrets, or will our consciousness burn out like the stars that created us? We have a short window of opportunity to expand the light of consciousness and advance human progress. It’s an opportunity we mustn’t waste.